RSS | Archive | Random

About

I'm Maya Dusenbery. I'm a writer and editor at Feministing.

Formerly, I was an editorial fellow at Mother Jones.

You can send tips/comments/job offers to me at maya [at] feministing [dot] com.
26 October 11
Universal, comprehensive sex education is not a radical notion. But for students who have not yet received that knowledge, it just might make a radical difference.
— On the manufactured controversy over New York City’s new sex education mandate.
4 August 11

“A woman’s health decisions are a private matter between her priest and her husband.”

19 June 11

But while Tupac was off getting it, two guys in suits with Right Online badges came up. “Hey ladies, when you get sick of Commie McNevershower here, you oughta come party with some real men. But be warned – we like guns, capitalism and we lay pipe like Alaskan oilmen. If you’re ready to step to the right, we’ll be firing up Macanudos on the patio.” Then one handed me his empty Guinness bottle and they walked off.

The womyn were totally outraged. “Can you believe that?” one said. “So arrogant, so … powerful. Let’s go give them a piece of our mind.” The other nodded. “Yes, a piece … of our minds.” As they went off to confront those sexist jerks, I shouted, “You go girls!”

So, back in my hotel room, I couldn’t sleep because of the drumming so I got on the computer and checked out “HotProgressiveBabes.com.” Well, there were at least two things wrong with that name and I’m not sure they were even progressive. I next wrote a Daily Kos piece on the need for a government entitlement program to assist those who George Bush has prevented from meeting girls.

— LOL. This conservative satire of the Netroots conference is so…revealing. Apparently, conservatives really like to see themselves as Real Men that deep-down all women want to fuck. Anxious masculinity much?
5 June 11

This is not a new idea by any stretch. But what is perhaps new, speaking in strictly modern terms, is the extent to which the elites of the nation have gone to convince themselves that such a thing is a damn fine and American idea, and that how could we possibly afford to give schoolchildren a few more apples when our top American corporations are suffering under an effective tax burden of zero percent, and when this terrible recession has rocked Wall Street, momentarily rendering their bonuses unclear before returning the besuited classes to businesses as usual, albeit with a few more homeless people on their sidewalks than usual.

I am not saying that the Republican position of lower taxes for the wealthy is inherently a bad or loathsome one. I am not saying that one political party is immoral, and the other party better.

But what I am saying is that if, in the end, your grandiosely presented and handsomely argued economic philosophy results in you constantly taking positions that, to repeat myself, make you look like a heartless son of a bitch, and which constantly come down in favor of the wealthy over the poor, or constantly choosing the connected over the unconnected, or the powerful over the powerless, or require you to demand we treat our children worse, or provide for our elders less, then you may, by process of deduction, simply be a heartless son of a bitch, and no amount of powerpoint slides, think-tank studies or prominent churchgoin’ will render it otherwise.

— According to the GOP’s Philosophy of Mean, we can’t afford $7 billion over 5 years to provide schoolchildren with fruits and vegetables.
20 April 11

The House GOP spending $500,000 in taxpayer money to defend DOMA

With the half million dollars you are paying to defend discrimination, you could do some better things! For example…

Put it towards family planning programs. Result: Save the government nearly $2 million down the road. Prevent about 520 unintended pregnancies and nearly 220 abortions.

Put it towards the Pell Grant program. Result: Help 100 additional students from low-income families get a higher education.

Put it towards SNAP, the federal food stamps program. Result: Ensure about 1,700 families of four living in poverty don’t go hungry this month. Stimulate over $900,000 in local economic activity.

Donate it to a few randomly selected bars in the U.S. Result: 125,000 lucky Americans unexpectedly get a free pint after a long day at work.

Commission an artist to create a paper mache sculpture with the dollar bills. Result: DC gets some new public art. Local artist gets a job. Government doesn’t defend discrimination.

Give it to these eagles to build their nest.

17 April 11
But the main point is, what are we supposed to have a civil discussion about? The truth is that the two parties have both utterly different goals and utterly different views about how the world works. It’s not nice to say this (but the truth is rarely nice): whatever they may say, Republicans are not concerned, above all, about the deficit. In fact, it’s not clear that they care about the deficit at all; they’re trying to use deficit concerns to push through their goal of dismantling the Great Society and if possible the New Deal; they have stated explicitly that they want to reduce taxes on high incomes to pre-New-Deal levels. And it’s an article of faith on their part that low taxes have magical effects on the economy.
— I agree with Paul Krugman. I am so over calls for “civility.”
14 April 11

Speechless. [via]

12 April 11

Stephen Colbert reports on the new Planned Parenthood: Walgreens. And can’t stop laughing about the ridiculousness of it all.

11 April 11
9 April 11
So why were Reid and Obama so eager to celebrate Boehner’s compromise with his conservative members? The Democrats believe it’s good to look like a winner, even if you’ve lost. But they’re sacrificing more than they let on. By celebrating spending cuts, they’ve opened the door to further austerity measures at a moment when the recovery remains fragile. Claiming political victory now opens the door to further policy defeats later. And policy defeats are what will matter.
Ezra on why the budget deal is bad—and why the way the Democrats are trying to sell it is even worse. And, of course, it wouldn’t be a bipartisan compromise without at least some women getting thrown under the bus. So while family planning funding has been saved (for now), DC can no longer use it’s own money to help poor women access abortions. Donate to the DC Abortion Fund here.
Themed by Hunson. Originally by Josh